The DH Dilemma: Re-legitimizing Dentine Hypersensitivity

Objectives: Bridging the Gap

We often treat Dentine Hypersensitivity (DH) as a secondary complaint, yet for patients, it can be a daily burden. The primary objective of this major crosssectional study was to examine the correlation between clinically assessed DH and the patient’s self-reported quality of life.

Methods: A Robust European Dataset

To get a true picture of the condition, researchers undertook an observational epidemiological study across seven European countries. The study didn’t just rely on patient complaints; it utilized a rigorous dual-approach:

1. Clinical Examination: Assessment of DH using an evaporative air stimulus (Schiff scale) alongside checks for Gingival Recession (GR) and Erosive Tooth Wear (ETW).

2. Patient Experience: A binary (Yes/No) pain report from the participant and a detailed questionnaire on lived experience.

Results: The Clinical Reality

A total of 3,551 participants (mean age 44.0) completed the study. The data provided three critical insights for everyday practice:

  • Location is Not Random: DH was significantly more common on buccal surfaces compared to lingual ones ($p < 0.001$).

    This localization is strongly linked to the anatomical reality of the buccal aspect, where bone coverage is often minimal (fenestration/dehiscence) and the gingival phenotype is thinner, making the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) highly vulnerable to recession and wear.

  • The Diagnostic Sweet Spot (Schiff 2/3): The study clarified the ambiguity of “mild” sensitivity. A binary patient report of “No” corresponded closely to a Schiff score of 0, while a definitive “Yes” aligned strongly with Schiff scores of 2 or 3.

    Interestingly, the study revealed a “First Tooth Phenomenon” where the first tooth tested (Tooth 17) yielded disproportionately high sensitivity scores (49.2%) compared to the contralateral side, likely due to patient anticipation rather than pathology.

  • Impact on Lived Experience: Perhaps the most important finding for patient management is the psychosocial burden. 37.5% of participants rated their DH pain intensity as “important,” and 14.9% rated it as “very important”.

Conclusions & Clinical Significance

DH is a prevalent condition that is strongly associated with buccal gingival recession and erosive tooth wear. However, it remains a “non-legitimized” dental pain condition in the eyes of many clinicians.

For over half of the participants, this pain is a significant factor in their daily lives. As dentists, we must shift our perspective: DH is not just a sensation; it is a quality-of-life issue. By focusing on robust diagnostic markers (Schiff 2/3) and acknowledging the “importance” of this pain to the patient, we can validate their experience and offer more targeted, effective management.

Reference:

West NX, Newcombe RG, Alonso B, Araoz A, Cosgarea R, Creeth J, Daly S, Davies M, Dias J, Faria-Almeida R, Gennai S, Graziani F, Griffith L, Harding M, Herrera D, Hellin N, Jepsen S, Legido B, Rioboo M, Prosper M, Seong J, Staehli A, Sculean A. Dentine hypersensitivity and associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data in seven European countries. J Dent. 2026 Mar;166:106313. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106313. Epub 2025 Dec 22. PMID: 41443552.
Share This !
WordPress PopUp Plugin
Quick Enquiry
close slider

    X
    ×